Document Type : Original Article


1 Department of Public Health, Debre Tabor University, College of Health Science, Debre Tabor, Ethiopia

2 Department of Midwifery, Debre Tabor University, College of Health Science, Debre Tabor, Ethiopia


Background: We conducted the present study to assess the practice of breast self-examination (BSE) among Debre Tabor University female undergraduate students, north central Ethiopia using health belief model (HBM).
Method: The current institution based cross-sectional study was carried out among a total of 341 students. Simple random sampling technique was employed to select the study participants. We also used self-administered pretested questionnaires and constructs of health belief model for collecting data. Binary and multivariable logistic regression were utilized to identify BSE-associated factors. Statistical significance was stated at p value < 0.05.
Results: Approximately 45% of the participants had a fair level of knowledge about breast cancer, but only 17% were actually performing BSE practice. The odds of practicing BSE were found to be higher among the participants who had information about BSE practice (AOR=7.21, 95% CI: (2.46, 21.15)), perceived susceptibility (AOR=14.18, 95% CI:(4.00, 50.48)), self-efficacy (AOR=3.07, 95% CI: (1.09, 8.70)), cue to action (AOR=3.68,95% CI: (1.17, 11.56)), and net benefit (AOR=7.75, 95% CI: (1.56, 38.55)) compared with counterparts. Whereas the odds of practicing BSE were found to be lower among those who had poor knowledge of BC (AOR=0.08, 95% CI: (0.03, 0.23)) compared with counterparts.
Conclusion: In this study, knowledge regarding breast cancer and BSE practice was observed to be low. Knowledge about breast cancer, having information on BSE, perceived susceptibility, self-confidence, and cue to action were found to be independent predictors of BSE practice. Providing targeted information about BSE is the best method of changing the behavioral intention of university students about breast cancer and BSE practice.


This article has been accepted for publication and undergone full peer review but has not been through the copyediting, typesetting, pagination, and proofreading process, which may lead to differences between this version and the Version of Record. Please cite this article as doi:10.30476/mejc.2021.84950.1245